
That's Ed.   He's got a cigarette in most photos.  And suspenders.  And furrowed facial expressions.  If you have to explain "He's a famous journalist", he's probably not that famous.  But he's the 
pre-Cronkite journalism gold standard, a relic from the days when one angle was good enough for America.
A documentary I produced won an 
Edward R. Murrow award.  First it won the "West Coast Regional", then it won the National Award for small-market news documentary. 
This is a good thing, to be sure.  I think.   My point is that it's also awkward.  When it aired, it was well-
received, but most people missed it.
So, the winners were posted.  My boss ran up the stairs to announce the good news.  Black-tie awards ceremony in NY in the fall.   
It was in the 
papers.  An aunt called from a plane when she found out.  Various local 
newspeople emailed.  A neighbor hollered "Nice work!" from the driveway. It's in the trades, and the industry people send nice notes; many bear a surprised undertone.  Sara's boss made some sort of congratulatory statement in a staff meeting.  Compared it to a Pulitzer, I hear. Let's not go that far.
In fact, let's take it down a notch.  Because, when I found out it won the nationwide prize: "Really?  
Humhm.  Cool." 
I think that most people have almost no clue what the award means.  I am among them.   
So, in the end, it's a nice little bonus.  Here are the lessons:
1.  Now I get it when people say "It's about the story, not us."
2.  Now I understand that there are a lot of awards for all sorts of things.
3. Now I have proof that over-editing isn't a total 
inefficiency. 
3. Smoking cigarettes gets an award named after you.